How do I calculate my grade?

Grading for this course will be rigorous. If an assignment illustrates disregard for spelling, grammar, citation guidelines, or a general carelessness in the writing, the assignment will be failed. Do not rely on your instructor for copy-editing, even on drafts. Do not rely on your instructor to calculate your grade for you throughout the semester or to determine what you "need to get an A"; it is your responsibility as a student to keep track of your grade. 

The writing assignments for this course are designed to meet the minimum requirements of the University Writing Requirement credit. To satisfy this requirement, every assignment’s word count must be fulfilled. Submitted assignments short of the minimum word count will receive zero credit. Any WR assignments without a completed peer review will receive -10% off of the final grade. 

Assignment Values

Rhetorical Analysis.     50
Media Analysis.          75
Definition.                 100
Evaluation.                200
Proposal.                  300
Challenge.                 100
Digital Portfolio.         75
Blog.                          50
Writing Process.         50
                              1000


*To calculate your grade, divide your points earned by the points possible. Move the decimal point two spaces to the right. This number is your grade percentage. Use the following table to determine your letter grade.

Grading Scale
A
4.0
93-100
930-1000

C
2.0
73-76
730-769
A-
3.67
90-92
900-929

C-
1.67
70-72
700-729
B+
3.33
87-89
870-899

D+
1.33 
67-69
670-699
B
3.0
83-86
830-869

D
1.0  
63-66
630-669
B-
2.67
80-82
800-829

D-
0.67 
60-62
600-629
C+
2.33
77-79
770-799

E  
0.00 
0-59
0-599










Assessment Rubric


SATISFACTORY (Y)
UNSATISFACTORY (N)
CONTENT
Papers exhibit evidence of ideas that respond to the topic with complexity, critically evaluating and synthesizing sources, and provide an adequate discussion with basic understanding of sources.
Papers either include a central idea(s) that is unclear or off- topic or provide only minimal or inadequate discussion of ideas. Papers may also lack sufficient or appropriate sources.
ORGANIZATION AND COHERENCE
Documents and paragraphs exhibit identifiable structure for topics, including a clear thesis statement and topic sentences.
Documents and paragraphs lack clearly identifiable organization, may lack any coherent sense of logic in associating and organizing ideas, and may also lack transitions and coherence to guide the reader.
ARGUMENT AND SUPPORT
Documents use persuasive and confident presentation of ideas, strongly supported with evidence. At the weak end of the satisfactory range, documents may provide only generalized discussion of ideas or may provide adequate discussion but rely on weak support for arguments.
Documents make only weak generalizations, providing little or no support, as in summaries or narratives that fail to provide critical analysis.
STYLE
Documents use a writing style with word choice appropriate to the context, genre, and discipline. Sentences should display complexity and logical structure. 
Documents rely on word usage that is inappropriate for the context, genre, or discipline. Sentences may be overly long or short with awkward construction. Documents may also use words incorrectly.
MECHANICS
Papers will feature correct or error-free presentation of ideas. At the weak end of the satisfactory range, papers may contain a few spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors that remain unobtrusive and do not obscure the paper’s argument or points.
Papers contain so many mechanical or grammatical errors that they impede the reader’s understanding or severely undermine the writer’s credibility.